[和合本] 这样，律法是与 神的应许反对吗？断乎不是！若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法，义就诚然本乎律法了。
[新标点] （奴仆和儿子）这样，律法是与 神的应许反对吗？断乎不是！若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法，义就诚然本乎律法了。
[和合修] （奴隶和儿子）这样，律法是与 神的【有古卷没有“ 神的”；另有古卷是“基督的”】应许对立吗？绝对不是！如果律法的颁布能使人得生命，义就诚然出于律法了。
[新译本] 这样，律法和上帝的应许是对立的吗？绝对不是。如果所赐下的律法能使人得生命，义就真的是出于律法了。
[当代修] 这样看来，上帝的律法和上帝的应许是否互相矛盾呢？当然不是！如果赐下的律法能带给人生命，人就可以靠律法成为义人了。
[现代修] 这样说来，法律跟上帝的应许相抵触吗？绝对不是！如果法律的颁布能够给人带来生命，人就可以靠法律而得以跟上帝有合宜的关系。
[吕振中] 这样，律法与应许相反么？断乎不是。假使有一个能使人活的律法曾经颁赐下来，称义就真是由于律法了。
[思高本] 那么，法律相反天主的恩许吗？绝对不是。如果所立定的法律能赐与人生命，正义就的确是出于法律了。
[文理本] 然则律与上帝之许相反乎、非也、若赐以能致生之律、则义诚由律矣、
[GNT] Does this mean that the Law is against God's promises? No, not at all! For if human beings had received a law that could bring life, then everyone could be put right with God by obeying it.
[BBE] Now a go-between is not a go-between of one; but God is one.
[KJV] Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
[NKJV] [Is] the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
[KJ21] Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should then have come by the law.
[NASB] Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? (Lit May it never happen!)Far from it! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness (Or would indeed be)would indeed have been (Lit out of, from)based on law.
[NRSV] Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could make alive, then righteousness would indeed come through the law.
[WEB] Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
[ESV] Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.
[NIV] Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
[NIrV] A go-between does not take sides. God didn't use a go-between when he made his promise to Abraham. But the same God was at work in both the law and the promise.
[HCSB] Is the law therefore contrary to God's promises? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly be by the law.
[CSB] Is the law therefore contrary to God's promises? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly be by the law.
[AMP] Is the Law then contrary and opposed to the promises of God? Of course not! For if a Law had been given which could confer [spiritual] life, then righteousness and right standing with God would certainly have come by Law.
[NLT] Is there a conflict, then, between God's law and God's promises? Absolutely not! If the law could give us new life, we could be made right with God by obeying it.
[YLT] the law, then, [is] against the promises of God? -- let it not be! for if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly by law there would have been the righteousness,